Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Peterson et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv02841
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Peterson, Jr, Jack William Top, Thomas John Toratti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Peterson et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00683
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Peterson, Jr, Jack William Top, Thomas John Toratti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Sheindlin v. Brady
as 1:2021cv01124
Defendant:
James Brady
Plaintiff:
Gregory Sheindlin
Not Classified By Court:
Kathianne Boniello
Interested Party:
Janet DiFiore, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., Frank H McCourt, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
VANCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv27021
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES R VANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vance et al v. Integris Health Inc et al
as 5:2016cv01298
Plaintiff:
Susan R Vance and James A Vance
Defendant:
Integris Health Inc, Integris Baptist Medical Center Inc, Steven J Reiter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vance et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00915
Plaintiff:
Tonie Elaine Vance and Jerry R Vance
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet U S Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vance v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv26920
Plaintiff:
Barbara R. Vance
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vance et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv03886
Plaintiff:
Lisa R. Vance and Christopher S. Vance
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ethicon, Inc. , Gynecare Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
