Cases 1 - 7 of 7
McCarthy et al v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv06683
Plaintiff:
S.S.M., V.A.L.M., Ana McCarthy and others
Defendant:
Mr. Alex Azar, II, State of New York, Mr. Steven Munkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCarthy et al v. United Airlines
as 1:2018cv04274
Plaintiff:
S.S.M., Ana McCarthy, V.A.M. and others
Defendant:
United Airlines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kathy McCornack v. Actavis Totowa, LLC
as 11-2350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHY MCCORNACK, an individual, DANIEL E. MCCORNACK, JR., an individual and R.J.M, a minor child by his mother and next friend Kathy McCornack
Defendant - Appellee:
ACTAVIS TOTOWA, LLC, a New Jersey corporation, ACTAVIS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, ACTAVIS ELIZABETH, LLC, a Delaware corporation and others
Kathy McCornack v. Actavis Totowa, LLC
as 11-2326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHY MCCORNACK, an individual, DANIEL E. MCCORNACK, JR., an individual and R.J.M, a minor child by his mother and next friend Kathy McCornack
Defendant - Appellee:
ACTAVIS TOTOWA, LLC, a New Jersey corporation, ACTAVIS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, ACTAVIS ELIZABETH, LLC, a Delaware corporation and others
National Specialty Insurance Company v. Carver et al
as 1:2009cv00668
Plaintiff:
National Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Charlotte Carver, Juvenile Male R.J.M., III, Christa Carver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Southern Polymer, Inc. v. R.J.M. Special Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03673
Plaintiff:
Southern Polymer, Inc. and Southern Polymer, Inc.
Defendant:
R.J.M. Special Products, Inc. and R.J.M. Plastics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Phanco et al v. R.J.M. Restaurant., Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00687
Plaintiff:
N. Maxine Phanco and Thomas W. Phanco
Defendant:
R.J.M. Restaurant., Inc., Russell Riddell and Mary Jo Riddell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
