Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Estate of Richard Matus, Jr. et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
Estate of Richard Matus, Jr., G.M., a minor, by and through Guardian Ad Litem, Lisa Matus, R.M., a minor, by and through Guardian Ad Litem, Lisa Matus and others
Defendant:
County of Riverside, a public entity, Riverside County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Chad Bianco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1455
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jefferson County Board of Edu v. Bryan M, et al
as 16-16882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, an agency of the State of Alabama
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN M and DARCY M, individually and as parents, guardians, next friends and legal representatives of R.M., a minor
COPE, et al v. KS State Board of Education, et al
as 14-3280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COPE, AKA Citizens for Objective Public Education, CARL REIMER, MARY ANGELA REIMER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KANSAS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, JANET WAUGH, Member of the Kansas State Board of Education, in her official capacity only, STEVE ROBERTS, Member of the Kansas State Board of Education, in his official capacity and others
J.C., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem Janet Chacon et al v. Guideone Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2014cv08230
Plaintiff:
A.C., a minor, by and through her Guardian ad Litem Bynesha Womack, A.H., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Kimberley Towns, J.C., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem Janet Chacon and others
Defendant:
Guideone Mutual Insurance Company
In re: Bruce Fagel, et al v. Bruce Fagel
as 10-56134
Debtor:
In the Matter of: BRUCE GARY FAGEL
Appellant:
R.M., a minor and incompetent, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, Denielle Morales
Appellee:
BRUCE GARY FAGEL, as a Law Corporation and individually
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
