Cases 81 - 90 of 2,590
Del Rivas Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3463
Petitioner:
MARISELA DEL RIVAS RAMOS and E. M. H.-R.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Sierra (Cruz)
as 23-7642
Defendant:
LEONIDES SIERRA, RICHARD GONZALEZ, CARLOS URENA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE CRUZ, Sealed Defendant 3, Prostituto and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Garcia Ramos v. Garland
as 23-60571
Petitioner:
Merli Garcia Ramos
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
McCollum v. Hayes et al
as 3:2023cv01414
Plaintiff:
Portia McCollum and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Defendant:
Gregory J. Hayes, Robert K. Ortberg, Frederic G. Reynolds and others
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Funes-Cardon, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3099
Petitioner:
AVELINA FUNES-CARDON and LUIS RAMOS-FUNES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ferran v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv01220
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Technologies Corporation and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jose R. Ferran, III
Defendant:
Gregory J. Hayes, Neil Mitchill, Anthony F. O'Brien and others
Ramos-Gutierrez v. Garland
as 23-1885
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN RAMOS-GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Kimberly Scott et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 2:2023cv08808
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Scott, Robin Warbey, Jacob Davis and others
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
USA v. Montalvo
as 23-20501
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jean Jossette Montalvo, also known as Jean J Ramos, also known as Jean J Rumus, also known as Jean Ramos
Delmi Ramirez-Ramos, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3827
Petitioner:
DELMI YULIBETH RAMIREZ-RAMOS, JIMMY ISAAC ORTIZ-RAMIREZ and JAHIR DANIEL ORTIZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
