Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Randolph Ashford v. T. Byrne
as 26-6959
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH ASHFORD
Defendant:
T. BYRNE, (MD) and P. DERRICK, (RN/HCA)
Pittman et al v. State of South Carolina, The et al
as 9:2026cv00437
Plaintiff:
Enoch Pittman, Bruce B. Thomas, Cedric Clinkscales and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, The Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, Honorable Alan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pittman et al
as 1:2026cv00437
Plaintiff:
Enoch Pittman, Bruce B. Thomas, Cedric Clinkscales and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, South Carolina, The State of and The Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashford v. Byrne et al
as 0:2025cv01156
Plaintiff:
Randolph Ashford
Defendant:
T. Byrne and P. Derrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Randolph Ashford v. Broad River Correctional Institution
as 23-6250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDOLPH ASHFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Ashford v. Broad River Correctional Institution
as 0:2022cv04359
Plaintiff:
Randolph Ashford
Defendant:
Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Banshee et al v. Stirling et al
as 6:2021cv01860
Defendant:
Terre K Marshall, Williams Akerman, Michael Hedgecock and others
Plaintiff:
Musa Banshee, Malik A Al-Shabazz, Randolph Ashford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashford v. Myers et al
as 0:2020cv03384
Defendant:
Vivian Elliot, Halford Myers, Yvonne Munro and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph Ashford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph Ashford v. Michael Stephan
as 19-6518
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL STEPHAN
Petitioner / Appellant:
RANDOLPH ASHFORD
Ashford v. Stephan
as 0:2018cv01262
Petitioner:
Randolph Ashford
Respondent:
Michael Stephan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
