Cases 11 - 20 of 71
NASH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11411
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE NASH and RANDY LEE NASH, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Randy SampsonIn re: Randy Sampson
as 22-12203
Petitioner:
In re: RANDY LEE SAMPSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
VANDAGRIFFT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08862
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE VANDAGRIFFT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Capehart v. Whitfield County Sheriff Office
as 4:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Capehart
Defendant:
Whitfield County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRYE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03306
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE FRYE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FAINTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22922
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE FAINTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crocker v. Butler et al(INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00656
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey and Reosha Butler
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Crocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serratt v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr., Jonathan Yancy, Roy Murphy Rutledge and others
Defendant:
Warden Butler, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85001
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACREE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv65763
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE ACREE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
