Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jerome Kobishop v. Randy Miller
as 22-3240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME W. KOBISHOP
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDY MILLER
Kobishop v. Miller
as 1:2022cv01335
Plaintiff:
Jerome W Kobishop
Defendant:
Randy Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terrance Shaw v. Paul Kemper, et al
as 22-1707
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE J. SHAW
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL S. KEMPER, Warden, JACK F. CHIOVATERO, RANDY MILLER and others
Nicole Cavicante et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv06676
Plaintiff:
NICOLE CAVICANTE, individually and as Successor in Interest to RANDY MILLER, deceased, JEREMY CAVICANTE, individually and as Successor in Interest to RANDY MILLER, deceased, Nicole Cavicante and others
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, OFFICER DANIEL NUNEZ, OFFICER ANTONIO VALASCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Breckinridge County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2021cv00112
Defendant:
Vicki Woodruff, Bruce Anthony, Breckinridge County, Kentucky and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Quinones v. Miller et al
as 1:2015cv01109
Plaintiff:
Wally Quinones
Defendant:
Randy Miller, Wendeline Olmo, Ebony Simons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. City of Sebastopol et al
as 4:2014cv05112
Defendant:
City of Sebastopol, Andrew Bauer, Nicolas Belliveau and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernaiz v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv03026
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hernaiz
Defendant:
Randy Miller, Cooper and Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Archer et al v. City of Taft, Ca. Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00261
Plaintiff:
Darrell Archer and Keitha Darquea
Defendant:
City of Taft, Ca. Inc., Dave Noerr, Randy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lebron v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv06921
Plaintiff:
Roger Lebron
Defendant:
City of New York, Roberta Hicks, F/K/U/ Nairod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
