Cases 1 - 10 of 100
W S v. Wood et al
as 1:2026cv03454
Plaintiff:
W.S.
Defendant:
Mark Wood, Rapides Parish Police Jury, Jay Slayter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C.D. v. Wood et al
as 1:2026cv03455
Plaintiff:
C.D.
Defendant:
Mark Wood, Rapides Parish Police Jury, Jay Slayter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C.H. v. Wood et al
as 1:2026cv03205
Plaintiff:
C.H.
Defendant:
Mark Wood, Rapides Parish Police Jury, Jay Slayter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
D.R. v. Wood et al
as 1:2026cv03203
Plaintiff:
D.R.
Defendant:
Mark Wood, Rapides Parish Police Jury, Jay Slayter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Probation & Parole et al
as 2:2026cv02895
Defendant:
LA Dept of Corrections Probation & Parole, Sheriffs Office Rapides Parish, Rapides Parish Detention Center III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Booze v. Rapides Parish et al
as 1:2026cv02045
Plaintiff:
Adrianne Booze
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office Rapides Parish, Administrator Doggett and Clerk of Court Rapides Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marler v. Wood
as 26-30323
Plaintiff:
Chantelle Maria Marler, individually & on behalf of her minor child H. L. M.
Defendant:
Mark Wood, in his individual & official capacity as Sheriff of Rapides Parish, Unknown Medical Service Provider, John Doe, Rapides Parish Deputies 1 - 10 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
