Cases 1 - 10 of 390
Raymond v. Poinsett County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Heith Jonathan Raymond
Defendant:
Poinsett County Jail, Susan Duffle, Elliot Nooner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatten v. USA
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hatten
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Does
as 4:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Does Employed by Arkansas Division of Correction, Benny Magness, John Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kidd v. Does
as 4:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Raymond Kidd
Defendant:
Does and Yell County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Randle et al
as 4:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Terrence Moore
Defendant:
Kenyon Randle, Paul Harris, Etherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lambert v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2023cv06086
Plaintiff:
John Raymond Lambert
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Scott v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Sarah Huckabee, Arkansas Division of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Combee v. USA
as 4:2023cv00559
Petitioner:
Raymond Morris Allen Combee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williamson v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Anthony B Williamson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
