Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 7.89 Acres of Land, Owned by Sandra Batterman Church, Armistead Steven Church, and Raymond William Batterman, Jr., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
7.89 Acres of Land, Owned by Sandra Batterman Church, Armistead Steven Church, and Raymond William Batterman, Jr., Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, Including: et al
as 4:2021cv00002
Defendant:
1.71 Acres of Land, Owned by David Lee Adams and Teressa H. Adams, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 2.60 Acres of Land, Owned by Faye L. Lowe and Glenn Anthony Lowe, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 5.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Dana H. Sparks, Trustee of the Billie Anne Harmon Living Trust, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Al-Azim et al v. Everett et al
as 3:2014cv00339
Plaintiff:
Raheem S. Al-Azim, Charles X and Victor X
Defendant:
J. Everett, R. W. Younce, V. M. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
X et al v. Everett et al
as 3:2012cv00739
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee X, Raheem S. Al-Azim, Charles X and others
Defendant:
J. Everett, R. W. Younce, V. M. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Cooke et al
as 1:2010cv01317
Plaintiff:
Raymond Williams
Defendant:
Earl Cooke, Seth Weinstein, Unidentified Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Turner
as 1:2010cv00139
Plaintiff:
Raymond Williams
Defendant:
Deputy Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
