Cases 21 - 30 of 50
RE/MAX LLC v. Alex Martin, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2015cv01752
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX LLC
Defendant:
Alex Martin, L.L.C. and Alexandria Martin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
RE/MAX, LLC v. Frank et al
as 1:2015cv00246
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Christopher K. Frank and Phoenix Acquisitions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
RE/MAX LLC v. Quality Living, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv02094
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX LLC
Defendant:
Quality Living, LLC and Randy W. Grindle
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
RE/MAX of New England, Inc. et al v. Prestige Real Estate, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv12121
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX of New England, Inc. and RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Prestige Real Estate, Inc. , LAER Realty Partners, Stacey Alcorn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
RE/MAX, LLC v. Property Professionals of Tampa Bay, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv00419
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Property Professionals of Tampa Bay, Inc. and Michael Carrigan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Re/Max, LLC v. Meridian Business Centers, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00226
Plaintiff:
Re/Max, LLC
Defendant:
Meridian Business Centers, Inc. and Robert Mead
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
RE/Max LLC v. GRP Realty, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv03425
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX LLC
Defendant:
GRP Realty, LLC and Hein Karman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Re/Max, LLC v. Results Realty of Southwest Florida, Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv02409
Plaintiff:
Re/Max, LLC
Defendant:
Results Realty of Southwest Florida, Inc and Michael A. Vale
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Re/Max LLC. v. Le et al
as 3:2013cv02625
Plaintiff:
Re/Max LLC.
Defendant:
Min Le and Amax Realty and Lending, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
RE/MAX, LLC v. McFarland Realty Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01126
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
McFarland Realty Enterprises, Inc., Robert McFarland, Sr. and Preston McFarland
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
