Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Hay et al
as 2:2021cv00265
Plaintiff:
William C Shaw
Defendant:
Ed Hay, Department of Corrections, City of Spokane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Hawkins v. Wagner et al
as 2:2020cv02549
Defendant:
Scott W. McGregor, Todd A. Pickles, Kyle F. Reardon and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Penny Davidi Borsuk et al v. The Transportation Corridor Agencies et al
as 8:2016cv00262
Plaintiff:
Penny Davidi Borsuk
Defendant:
Ross Chun, DOES, Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency and others
Reardon v. City of Chico et al
as 2:2015cv02410
Plaintiff:
Sean Patrick Reardon
Defendant:
City of Chico, Michael A Dunbaugh, Michael O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denise Reardon et al v. Titus West Apartments LLC
as 2:2014cv03257
Plaintiff:
Denise Reardon and Southern California Housing Rights Center Inc
Defendant:
Titus West Apartments LLC
Block v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2014cv00235
Plaintiff:
Anne K Block
Defendant:
Snohomish County , The City of Gold Bar , Joe Beavers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robin Rosen v. Richard Booth, et al
as 12-55685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBIN ROSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD BOOTH, JEFFREY BRISKIN, BRISKIN LATZANICH AND PENE and others
Bailey Witt, I v. Snohomish County Washington, et al
as 12-35129
Petitioner - Appellant:
BAILEY CREDO WITT, I
Defendant - Appellee:
SNOHOMISH COUNTY WASHINGTON, AARON REARDON, in his official capacity as Snohomish County Executive, DEANNA DAWSON, in her official capacity as Executive Director of Public Safety and others
Robin Rosen v. Richard Booth et al
as 8:2011cv01703
Defendant:
N Denise Taylor, The Doctors Company, Denise Greer and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Rosen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
