Cases 1 - 8 of 8
James Redd v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv07146
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James Redd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nathaniel Redd v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv06537
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Redd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hill v. Whitten Center et al
as 6:2023cv05731
Plaintiff:
Marteebia Hill
Defendant:
Whitten Center, Elizabeth Redd and Craig Byrd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Redd v. Byrd et al
as 9:2023cv01605
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Daquan Redd
Defendant:
Investigator Robert Byrd, Investigator Todd Duncan, P.J. Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhoades et al Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC
as 1:2021cv03391
Plaintiff:
Shawn Phillip Rhoades, Joseph Franklin Dennis, Joshua Marshall Floyd and others
Defendant:
Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Allen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen, Kenneth Allen, Kyle Amburgey and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Arnett et al v. Fluor Enterprises Inc et al
as 0:2019cv00346
Plaintiff:
James Bland, John Brunson, Douglas Carman and others
Defendant:
Fluor Enterprises Inc, SCANA Corporation, Fluor Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Boyd v. KLLM Transport Services Inc et al
as 3:2010cv03208
Plaintiff:
Don Boyd
Defendant:
KLLM Transport Services Inc, Wells Marble & Hurst PLLC, Roy H Liddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
