Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Brown v. Wier et al
as 7:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Terrance Brown
Defendant:
Judge Robert Wier, Chief Judge Danny Reeves and Senior Judge Joseph Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jipson et al v. Workman et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Hillary Jipson and Elijah Reeves
Defendant:
Robert Workman and Montgomery County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Reeves v. Walmart Inc.
as 6:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Bridget Reeves
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Popejoy v. Edwards et al
as 6:2020cv00156
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Popejoy
Defendant:
Laurel County Sheriff's Dept., Det. Bryan Lawson, Sgt. Chris Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clopton v. Boyd et al
as 5:2019cv00205
Defendant:
Deputy Smith, Sergeant Robison, Sergeant Joiner and others
Plaintiff:
Chasity D. Clopton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Popejoy v. Edwards et al
as 6:2019cv00284
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Popejoy
Defendant:
Det. Bryan Lawson, Sgt. Chris Edwards and Sgt. Brett Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Popejoy v. Edwards et al
as 3:2019cv00809
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Popejoy
Defendant:
Sgt Chris Edwards, Det. Bryan Lawson and Sgt. Brett Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. Quickway Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00733
Defendant:
Quickway Logistics, Inc., Brooklyn Bedstuy Taylor, Quickway Transportation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reeves v. USA
as 1:2018cv00044
Petitioner:
Christopher York Reeves
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mays v. Knox County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Randy Mays
Defendant:
Knox County, Kentucky , Mary Hammons , Bradley Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
