Cases
Reniece Kabando v. Dana Boente We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1773
Plaintiff - Appellant: RENIECE L.W. KABANDO
Defendant - Appellee: DANA JAMES BOENTE, United States Attorney, Eastern District of Virginia, DENNIS CARL BARGHAAN, JR., Assistant United States Attorney, Eastern District of Virginia and STEVEN E. GORDON, Assistant United States Attorney, Eastern District of Virginia
Reniece Kabando v. Dana Boente We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1157
Plaintiff - Appellant: RENIECE L.W. KABANDO
Defendant - Appellee: DANA JAMES BOENTE, United States Attorney, Eastern District of Virginia, DENNIS CARL BARGHAAN, JR., Assistant United States Attorney, Eastern District of Virginia and STEVEN E. GORDON, Assistant United States Attorney, Eastern District of Virginia
Kabando v. Boente et al
as 1:2017cv00076
Plaintiff: Reniece L.W. Kabando
Defendant: Dana J. Boente, Dennis C. Barghaan, Jr. and Steven E. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Reniece Kabando
as 16-2245
Petitioner: In re: RENIECE L.W. KABANDO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2229
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01320
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01040
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KABANDO v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00562
Plaintiff: RENIECE L.W. KABANDO
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
KABANDO v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00286
Plaintiff: RENIECE L.W. KABANDO
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?