Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Christopher Roberts v. Jennifer Gettle, et al
as 23-3198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER W. GETTLE, RICHARD A. LEWIS and EDWARD M. MARSICO, JR.
Roberts v. Gettle et al
as 1:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Christopher Roberts
Defendant:
Jennifer W. Gettle, Richard A. Lewis and Edward M. Marsico, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Marsico, Jr. et al
as 1:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harris
Defendant:
Edward M. Marsico, Jr., Francis T. Chardo, Richard A. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Richard Lewis v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 22-2480
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD L. LEWIS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Lewis v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00282
Petitioner:
Richard L. Lewis
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vasquez v. Gale et al
as 1:2020cv01805
Defendant:
Martha Gale, President Judge Richard A. Lewis, Adrian and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Murrell, Jr. v. Michael Consiglio, et al
as 20-2085
Defendant / Appellee:
S. BAKER KENSINGER, GOLDBERG KATZMAN LAW FIRM, COURT ADMINISTRATOR OFFICE, Dauphin County Courthouse and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE MURRELL, JR.
Lewis v. Metzger et al
as 1:2018cv02028
Respondent:
Matt Denn and Dana Metzger
Petitioner:
Richard L. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Metzger et al
as 1:2018cv01226
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Lewis
Defendant:
Dana Metzger, Department of Justice and State Of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Chardo et al
as 1:2018cv00477
Plaintiff:
Aiyda Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant:
Francis T. Chardo, Richard A. Lewis and Bradley A. Winnick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
