Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43176
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BARKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv68666
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES RICHARD BARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARKER v. Columbus Regional Healthcare System, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00108
Defendant:
REGIONAL ONCOLOGY LLC, COLUMBUS REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC, JOHN B AMOS CANCER CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BARKER and STATE OF GEORGIA
Intervenor Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Freeney v. Montgomery City (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00404
Plaintiff:
Richard Barker Freeney
Defendant:
Montgomery City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeney v. The Makers of Depokote, Seraql. Lexpro, and Albifiy (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00372
Plaintiff:
Richard Barker Freeney
Defendant:
The Makers of Depokote, Seraql. Lexpro, and Albifiy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeney v. Marshall et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00373
Plaintiff:
Richard Barker Freeney
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall, C.O. Lyold, C.O. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeney v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00371
Plaintiff:
Richard Barker Freeney
Defendant:
State of Alabama and MCDF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeney v. Hempburg (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00343
Plaintiff:
Richard Barker Freeney
Defendant:
Doctor Hempburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeney v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00347
Plaintiff:
Richard Barker Freeney
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeney v. Price (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00346
Plaintiff:
Richard Barker Freeney
Defendant:
Charles Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
