Cases 1 - 10 of 10
JACKSON v. MOOREFIELD et al
as 2:2019cv02891
Defendant:
SATELLITE'S, TCB.GOV, NRC.GOV and others
Plaintiff:
NEAL D. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BANKS v. DISNEY et al
as 2:2016mc00650
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DISNEY, DISNEY RESPORTS, ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
BANKS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2015cv01498
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, ROBERT CESSOR, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. HICKMAN et al
as 2:2015cv01342
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DAVID HICKMAN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. CONTI et al
as 2:2015cv01341
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
JOY FLOWERS CONTI, US DIST COURT FOR THE WEST DIST OF PA, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 2:2015cv00700
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. One or More Unknown Named FCC Forrest City Low Compound Officers, et al
as 1:2013cv01357
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
One or More Unknown named FCC Forrest City Low Compound Officers, 50 John/Jane Does, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Banks et al v. FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound, Dougless Williams, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. Sager et al
as 1:2011cv00741
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
S. Sager, R & D Department, Fort Dix, NJ CFCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
A. Whitaker, Stevens, J. Tenor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
