Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Campbell v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00265
Plaintiff:
John Richard Campbell
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cook County Dept. of Corrections and Cermak Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Mollenhauer et al
as 3:2014cv01673
Plaintiff:
John Richard Campbell
Defendant:
Sheriff Mollenhauer, Sgt Ulrich and Deputy Sheriff Thomason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WAYMYERS v. PRAUSE et al
as 3:2013cv00126
Plaintiff:
ONTORIO CORTEZ WAYMYERS, SR
Defendant:
ROBERT PRAUSE, PATRICK PAQUETTE, LARRY CHRIS HOUSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN et al v. PRAUSE et al
as 3:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE TORNELL GREEN
Defendant:
ROBERT PRAUSE, PATRICK PAQUETTE, SCOTT SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Kane County Jail et al
as 1:2012cv07058
Plaintiff:
Darcy D. Bell
Defendant:
Kane County Jail, Patrick B. Perez, Chris Ducay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kist v. Wells et al
as 3:2011cv00877
Plaintiff:
John E. Kist
Defendant:
Joseph Wells, Dean Kelly, Barry Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon v. Fillis et al
as 4:2011cv40019
Plaintiff:
Celestino Colon
Defendant:
Charles Fillis, Thomas Ficco, Richard Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Boatwright v. State of Nevada, et al
as 10-17161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN BOATWRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT and others
Richard Campbell v. United States Parole Commissio, et al
as 08-5104
Petitioner - Appellant:
Richard Campbell
Respondent - Appellee:
United States Parole Commission and Devon Brown, DC Detention Facility Director
Madyun v. Campbell et al
as 2:2008cv00148
Plaintiff:
Atif Saleem Madyun
Defendant:
Richard Campbell and Andrew McCain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
