Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Johnson v. Atteberry et al
as 7:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Richard J Johnson
Defendant:
Barbara L Atteberry, Joshua R. Capps, Kendall T Richerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Director TDCJ - CID
as 7:2018cv00046
Petitioner:
Richard J Johnson
Respondent:
Director TDCJ - CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc., et al v. Houston Casualty Company, et al
as 14-55071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IMPAC MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, INC., IMPAC FUNDING CORPORATION, IMPAC SECURED ASSETS CORP. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY and THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON, Subscribing to Certificate Nos. SUA12325 and SUA 12084
Farrell v. State of Florida Republicans et al
as 2:2013cv00140
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lorne Farrell
Defendant:
State of Florida Republicans, Rick Scott, Pam Bondi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Van Dyke v. Needleman et al
as 6:2012cv01918
Plaintiff:
Ron Van Dyke
Defendant:
Mitch Needleman, J. Preston Silvernail , John M. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard Johnson v. Martha Maes, et al
as 12-10973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD J JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTHA MAES, Sergeant, S.T.G., D. OWENS, S.T.G. and M. VENABLE, Sergeant, S.T.G.
Richard Johnson v. PLRA's 3 Strikes Provision, et al
as 12-10950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD J JOHNSON, also known as Richard James Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
PLRA'S 3 STRIKES PROVISION and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS
Johnson v. Constitutional Question et al
as 1:2012cv00853
Defendant:
Constitutional Question, Mary Lou Robinson's General Order and PLRA's 3 Strike Provision
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. PLRA 3 Strike Provision
as 6:2012cv00603
Plaintiff:
Richard J Johnson
Defendant:
PLRA 3 Strike Provision
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
