Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Lee v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10773
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, et al v. Paiva
as 23-1919
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD LEE PAIVA
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS A. PALMIGIANO, WILLIAM J. O'BRIEN, JOHN F. PIERCE and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC DAY, WILLIAM THOMAS, DANIEL SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF RI
Interested Party:
KENNETH WILSON, CHRISTOPHER HADLEY, NORMAN WHEELER and others
Butts v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv11983
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Butts
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Paiva v. Coyne-Fague, et al
as 21-1746
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD LEE PAIVA
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, individually and in her Official Capacity as Director of the Rhode Island Department of Corrections and RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Paiva v. Grande, et al
as 21-1504
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD LEE PAIVA
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN GRANDE, individually and in her official capacity as a doctor at RIDOC, PAULINE MARCUSSEN, individually and in her official capacity as a doctor at RIDOC and JUSTIN BERK, individually and in his official capacity as a doctor at RIDOC
Paiva v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00499
Defendant:
Rui Diniz, Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Pauline Marcussen and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Paiva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paiva v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2020cv00250
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections and Particia Coyne-Fague
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Paiva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klapatch et al v. BHI Energy I Power Services, LLC
as 1:2018cv11581
Plaintiff:
Dennis Klapatch and Richard Lee
Defendant:
BHI Energy I Power Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
