Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Philip v. Executive Clemency Unit et al
as 1:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Ashton Jamarr Philip
Defendant:
Executive Clemency Unit, Zane Duncan, Roberta Kustoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas et al v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2023cv01204
Plaintiff:
Carvin Thomas and Terrell Lawrence
Defendant:
Richard Montgomery, Zane Duncan, Gary Faulcon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTGOMERY v. WARDEN, F.C.I. FAIRTON
as 1:2023cv03780
Petitioner:
RICHARD MONTGOMERY
Respondent:
WARDEN, F.C.I. FAIRTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MONTGOMERY v. WARDEN, F.C.I. FAIRTON
as 1:2022cv02578
Petitioner:
RICHARD MONTGOMERY
Respondent:
WARDEN, F.C.I. FAIRTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morris Rucker v. Jim Purviance, et al
as 22-5192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MORRIS RUCKER
Defendant / Appellee:
JIM PURVIANCE, Executive Director of the Tennessee Board of Parole, RICHARD MONTGOMERY, Tennessee Chairman, ZANE DUNCAN, Tennessee Board Member, Tennessee Board of Parole and others
Montgomery v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv00826
Plaintiff:
Richard Montgomery
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Richard Montgomery v. Warden, FCI Fairton
as 5:2021cv00784
Petitioner:
RICHARD MONTGOMERY
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FAIRTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rucker v. Purviance et al
as 3:2021cv00555
Plaintiff:
Morris Rucker
Defendant:
Jim Purviance, Richard Montgomery, Zane Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wortman III v. State of Tennessee Board of Parole et al
as 3:2020cv00156
Defendant:
Mark Edward Davidson, f/n/u Stewart, Richard Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Auston Wortman III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sotherland v. Ford et al
as 1:2019cv00080
Defendant:
Richard Montgomery, Tim Gobble, Yusuf Hakeem and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Sotherland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
