Cases 41 - 50 of 55
McPherson v. Scheindlin et al
as 1:2012cv04794
Plaintiff:
Racquel McPherson
Defendant:
Shira Scheindlin , Richard Sullivan and Southern District of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03647
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv08443
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Blanco v. Sullivan and Sullivan, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv62202
Plaintiff:
Israel Blanco
Defendant:
Sullivan and Sullivan, Inc. and Richard Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Memrad Medical Group Inc et al v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 8:2011cv00418
Defendant:
Carolina Casualty Insurance Company and Does
Plaintiff:
Jhemon Lee, Robert Marcus, Memrad Medical Group Inc and others
BROWN v. COVERT et al
as 1:2010cv06122
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
WILLIAM COVERT, RICHARD CALABRESE, MARC CARNIVALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Cummins Power South, LLC
as 9:2010cv80767
Plaintiff:
Richard Sullivan
Defendant:
Cummins Power South, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pratt v. Comm-Trans et al
as 2:2009cv02652
Plaintiff:
Charles Benton Pratt, IV
Defendant:
Comm-Trans and Richard Sullivan
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
MACHIAS SAVINGS BANK v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2009cv00284
Defendant:
THOMAS A ROBERTS , CATHERINE SULLIVAN ROBERTS and RICHARD SULLIVAN
Cross_defendant:
THOMAS A ROBERTS , RICHARD SULLIVAN and BURLEIGH M HUTCHINS
Cross_claimant:
BURLEIGH M HUTCHINS , LORRAINE M HUTCHINS , PETER E ELLIS and others
Plaintiff:
HEG LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
