Cases 31 - 40 of 171
State of Washington v. Trump et al
as 2:2019cv01502
Defendant:
Matthew Donovan, US Department of the Interior, US Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
State of Washington
Amicus Curiae:
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, National Immigration Law Center, Amici Curiae Former U.S. Government Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
DOE et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv01597
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 1 , JANE DOE 2 , JANE DOE 3 and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP , JAMES N. MATTIS , JOSEPH F. DUNFORD, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01942
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Ahmad Aljindi v. USA, et al
as 19-55926
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW P. DONOVAN, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, RICHARD V. SPENCER, Secretary, Department of the Navy, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMAD JAMALEDDIN ALJINDI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02541
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02910
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00404
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
William Owens v. Richard Spencer
as 19-55979
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM C. OWENS
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD V. SPENCER, Secretary of the Department of the Navy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01680
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
