Cases 31 - 40 of 221
Mitchell v. Bell et al
as 3:2011mc00079
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Lee Mitchell
Defendant:
Ricky Bell, Tennessee Department of Correction and State of Tennessee
Michael Hart v. Ricky Bell, et al
as 11-6405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HART
Defendant:
RICKY BELL and SANDRA HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSHUA MCCALL, Corporal in his individual capacity as a Correctional Officer at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution and BRANDON JACKSON, in his individual capacity as a Correctional Officer at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution
Thompson v. Bell, et al
as 2:2011cv02747
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Defendant:
Ricky Bell, EJS Enterprises, Inc. and Progressive Mountain Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gary Sutton v. Ricky Bell
as 11-6180
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY WAYNE SUTTON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICKY BELL, Warden
Anderson v. Commissioner Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00806
Plaintiff:
Trevor Manny Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner Tennessee Department of Corrections, Ricky Bell, Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Bell et al
as 3:2011mc00049
Plaintiff:
Chris Chapman
Defendant:
Ricky Bell, Sandra Hall, (f/n/u) Mosby and others
Thomas v. Bell
as 1:2011cv01193
Petitioner:
Mario Thomas
Respondent:
Ricky Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gabble Mitchell v. Ricky Bell, et al
as 11-5642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GABBLE LEE MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
RICKY BELL, Warden, RMSI and LARHONDA HOWARD, Financial Specialist, United States District Court Clerk
Ricky Bell v. R.C. Scholtz, et al
as 11-1961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
R.C. SCHOLTZ, Doctor, ROGER E. WALKER, JR., MICHAEL PRITCHARD, Lt. #9985 and others
Eddie Williams, Jr. v. Ricky Bell, et al
as 11-5402
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RICKY BELL, INOCENTES SATOR, SANDRA HALL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
