Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jones v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2026cv02033
Plaintiff:
Jason Jones
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, David Drummond, Curtis Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montelongo v. Weiland, et al.
as 26-3975
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MONTELONGO
Defendant:
JAMES WEILAND, WILLIAM GITTERE, CURTIS RIGNEY and others
Capel v. City of Norfolk et al
as 2:2026cv00472
Plaintiff:
Jermaine M. Capel
Defendant:
City of Norfolk, Commonwealth of Virginia, Judge Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Harris v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 26-2265
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, W. A. GITTERE and others
DOCK SEAFOOD NEW ALBANY, INC. v. MERCHANT WAREHOUSE INCORPORATED
as 1:2026cv02773
Plaintiff:
Dock Seafood New Albany, Inc.
Defendant:
MERCHANT WAREHOUSE INCORPORATED and JOSEPH RIGNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rocco v. Royal et al
as 3:2026cv00228
Plaintiff:
Raphael Rocco
Defendant:
Terry Royal, Mathew Diken, Kenneth L. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shingary v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2026cv00213
Plaintiff:
Bryan Lee Shingary
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Adams, Boardman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNair v. Rigney et al
as 3:2026cv00200
Petitioner:
Michael McNair
Respondent:
C. Rigney and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rocco v. Royal et al
as 3:2026cv00194
Plaintiff:
Raphael Rocco
Defendant:
Terry Royal, Haymen, Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanier v. Southworth et al
as 3:2026cv00187
Plaintiff:
Jacques Lanier
Defendant:
Donald Southworth, James Dzurenda, Terry Royal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
