Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Cortez v. Stubbs, et al.
as 26-5639
Plaintiff: MOISES JOSUE CORTEZ
Defendant: BRANDON STUBBS, MATTHEW ROMAN, J. WEILAND and others
John A.W. Degen v. Emily Testwuide et al
as 3:2026cv00540
Plaintiff: John A.W. Degen
Defendant: Emily Testwuide, Terry Royal, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2026cv02033
Plaintiff: Jason Jones
Defendant: James Dzurenda, David Drummond, Curtis Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Borgas et al
as 3:2026cv00474
Plaintiff: Lionel King
Defendant: Debora Borgas, Terry Royal, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montelongo v. Weiland, et al.
as 26-3975
Plaintiff: VICTOR MONTELONGO
Defendant: JAMES WEILAND, WILLIAM GITTERE, CURTIS RIGNEY and others
Capel v. City of Norfolk et al
as 2:2026cv00472
Plaintiff: Jermaine M. Capel
Defendant: City of Norfolk, Commonwealth of Virginia, Judge Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Harris v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 26-2265
Plaintiff: ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant: STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, W. A. GITTERE and others
DOCK SEAFOOD NEW ALBANY, INC. v. MERCHANT WAREHOUSE INCORPORATED We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2026cv02773
Plaintiff: Dock Seafood New Albany, Inc.
Defendant: MERCHANT WAREHOUSE INCORPORATED and JOSEPH RIGNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rocco v. Royal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2026cv00228
Plaintiff: Raphael Rocco
Defendant: Terry Royal, Mathew Diken, Kenneth L. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shingary v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2026cv00213
Plaintiff: Bryan Lee Shingary
Defendant: James Dzurenda, Adams, Boardman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?