Cases 1 - 10 of 78
James Mosley v. Rivers Casino, et al
as 26-2870
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
RIVERS CASINO, CASINO MANAGER and SECURITY GUARDS
MOSLEY v. RIVERS CASINO et al
as 2:2026cv05111
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
RIVERS CASINO, CASINO MANAGER and SECURITY PERSONELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00792
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MOSLEY v. RIVERS CASINO et al
as 2:2026cv02994
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
RIVERS CASINO, CASINO MANAGER and SECURITY GUARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BALLARD-HOLMES et al v. RUSH STREET GAMING, LLC et al
as 2:2025cv00807
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY BALLARD-HOLMES and HUNTER THOMAS
Defendant:
RUSH STREET GAMING, LLC and SUGARHOUSE HSP GAMING, L.P. doing business as RIVERS CASINO PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
HERMANN v. RUSH STREET GAMING LLC et al
as 2:2025cv00130
Defendant:
RUSH STREET GAMING LLC and SUGARHOUSE HSP GAMING, L.P. doing business as RIVERS CASINO PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff:
BONNIE HERMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
NELSON v. RUSH STREET GAMING, LLC et al
as 2:2025cv00106
Defendant:
RUSH STREET GAMING, LLC and SUGARHOUSE HSP GAMING, L.P. doing business as RIVERS CASINO PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff:
BRETT NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
