Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jacobs v. District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2010cv02622
Plaintiff:
Andre Jacobs
Defendant:
District Attorney's Office, Jeffery A. Beard, Office of Professional Responsibility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifton Williams v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 10-3903
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFTON WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, ULLI KLEMM, ROBERT BITNER and others
Rodney Burns v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 09-2872
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY BURNS
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, GRATERFORD SCI, JEFFREY BEARD and others
Williams v. Beard et al
as 4:2008cv01915
Plaintiff:
Clifton Williams
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Ulli Klemm, Robert Bitner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Shannon et al
as 1:2008cv01895
Plaintiff:
Eric Hall
Defendant:
Robert D. Shannon, David Anthony Varano, Michael Wenerowicz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robert Hankins v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-3539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HANKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC ARMEL, JEFFREY BEARD, ROBERT BITNER and others
Defendant:
MARSH, H. CLIFFORD O'HARA, KECK and others
HANKINS v. BEARD et al
as 1:2008cv00219
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HANKINS
Defendant:
DONALD KELCHNER, MARK KRYSEVIG, BLAINE STEIGERWALT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pressley v. Huber et al
as 3:2008cv00449
Plaintiff:
Sean Pressley
Defendant:
Adam Huber, D. Zimmerman, Blaine E. Steigerwalt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sean Pressley v. Conner Blaine, et al
as 08-1517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAN PRESSLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BEN E. ANSELL, ROBERT BITNER, CONNER BLAINE and others
HANKINS v. BEARD et al
as 1:2007cv00332
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HANKINS
Defendant:
JEFFARY A. BEARD, WILLIAM STICKMAN, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
