Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Garcia et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv05086
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Garcia, Sr., Lance Cruell, Jamir Riviere and others
Defendant:
City of New York and Legal Aid Society
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re Synchronoss Technologies
as 21-2055
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD W. HOVSEPAIN, WILLIAM J. CADOGAN, STEPHEN G. WALDIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARRY A. COLTRANE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISA LABOEUF
THIEFFRY v. ROSENBERGER et al
as 3:2020cv07224
Defendant:
THOMAS J. HOPKINS, PETER BERGER, ROBERT AQUILINA and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA THIEFFRY
LAUGHLIN v. WALDIS et al
as 3:2020cv07150
Defendant:
THOMAS J. HOPKINS, GLENN LURIE, ROBERT AQUILINA and others
Plaintiff:
KIRK LAUGHLIN
LAUGHLIN v. WALDIS et al
as 3:2017cv09039
Plaintiff:
KIRK LAUGHLIN
Defendant:
STEPHEN G. WALDIS, WILLIAM J. CADOGAN, THOMAS J. HOPKINS and others
Movant:
LARRY A. COLTRANE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Garcia v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv05463
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Garcia
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Garcia v. Falk et al
as 1:2010cv01688
Defendant:
Mrs. Ames, C. Benjamin, Mr. R. Chong and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Division of Parole et al
as 1:2009cv02045
Defendant:
Mrs. Ames, C. Benjamin, Mr. R. Chong and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Division of Parole Executive Department et al
as 1:2009cv04119
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Garcia
Defendant:
Division of Parole Executive Department, NYS Department of Corrections, Michael Falk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
