Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ESPINOSA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16483
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ESPINOSA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Riki O'Hailpin, et al v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., et al
as 22-15558
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RIKI O'HAILPIN, NINA ARIZUMI, ROBERT ESPINOSA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC. and HAWAIIAN HOLDINGS, INC.
Riki O'Hailpin, et al v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., et al
as 22-15215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RIKI O'HAILPIN, NINA ARIZUMI, ROBERT ESPINOSA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC. and HAWAIIAN HOLDINGS, INC.
O'Hailpin v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Riki O'Hailpin, Nina Arizumi, Robert Espinosa and others
Defendant:
Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. and Hawaiian Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
USA v. Robert Garcia, Jr.
as 19-11311
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT ESPINOSA GARCIA, JR., also known as "Blunt"
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NICHOLSON, ET AL. v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00490
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. and TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN NICHOLSON, ET AL., EUELL STANFIELD, ANGELIQUE GRAY and others
Counter Defendant:
DOMINIQUE BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
