Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Walter Edward Hayden et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01746
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Edward Hayden, John Lawrence Kemp, Gregory David Kaser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
David Goad v. Robert Camareno, et al
as 15-50448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GOAD
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT CAMARENO, DOES 1 THROUGH 25, ALBERT LOPEZ and others
Muecke Company, Incorporated, et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation, et al
as 14-41213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUECKE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, BRUCE ROGERS, doing business as Rogers Pharmacy, BROOKSHIRE BROTHERS PHARMACY OF KIRBYVILLE, TEXAS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, CVS PHARMACY, INCORPORATED, CAREMARK RX, L.L.C. and others
Goad v. Doe et al
as 5:2013cv00063
Defendant:
Jennifer Doe, Does 1 thru 50, Robert Kinsey and others
Plaintiff:
David Goad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Muecke Company, Inc., et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation, et al
as 12-40475
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MUECKE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, BRUCE ROGERS, Individually and doing business as Rogers Pharmacy, BROOKSHIRE BROTHERS PHARMACY OF KIRBYVILLE, TEXAS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, COMPANY CVS PHARMACY, INCORPORATED and CAREMARK RX INC
The Muecke Company, Inc. et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 6:2010cv00078
Plaintiff:
The Muecke Company, Inc. , Bruce Rogers , Brookshire Bros. Pharmacy of Kirbyville Texas and others
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation , CVS Pharmacy, Inc , Caremark Rx, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
The Estate of Vernon E. Kinsey et al v. United States Of America
as 1:2007cv00441
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Vernon E. Kinsey, Lela Faye Kinsey, David Kinsey and others
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
