Cases
Cases 21 - 27 of 27
United States of America v. State of New York
as 10-3602
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: George Pataki, Governor of the State of New York, New York State Board of Elections, Peter S. Kosinski, Deputy Executive Director of the New York State Board of Elections and others
Defendant - Appellant: State of New York, University of the State of New York, Richard P. Mills, President of the University of the State of New York and Commissioner of the New York State Education Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02449
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
KING V OPM We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3056
Respondent: Office of Personnel Management, Office of Personnel Management, Office of Personnel Management and others
Petitioner: Robert L. King, Jr., Robert L. King, Jr., Robert L. King, Jr. and others
KING v. OWENS-ILLIINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv87106
Plaintiff: ROBERT L. KING
Defendant: OWENS-ILLIINOIS, INC., RAILROAD FRICTION PRODUCTS CORPORATION, WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
The United States of America v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2008mc00021
Plaintiff: The United States of America
Defendant: The State of New York, Eliot Spitzer, the New York State Board of Elections and others
Movant: Niagara County Community College, Niagara County Community College, Niagara County Community College and others
Robert L. King v. Garlock, Inc., et al.
as MSS/1:07-CV-00604
Defendant: Garlock, Inc
Plaintiff: Robert L. King
King v. Garlock, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00604
Plaintiff: Robert L. King
Defendant: Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pullman Passenger Car Company, Inc., Railroad Friction Products Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?