Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Murray v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
Robert L Murray
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murray et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Murray and Shaquan Butler
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe C.O., John Doe Capt. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Shaquan Butler, Robert L. Muray and Robert L. Murray
Defendant:
City of New York, 5 John Doe C.O., John Doe Capt. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Murray
as 1:2022cv06684
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert L. Murray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Murray
as 5:2022cv01329
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert L. Murray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Murray v. Dabo et al
as 1:2022cv04026
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Murray
Defendant:
OMH Dr. Dabo, RN John Doe, 2 Jane Doe Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray et al v. C.O. John Doe et al
as 1:2022cv00973
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Murray
Defendant:
C.O. John Doe and OMH Jan Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Department of Law et al
as 1:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Murray and Leviticus Lucfer
Defendant:
Department of Law, Police Officer Notaros, Police Officer Wasback and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURRAY v. ZATECKY
as 1:2019cv01244
Respondent:
DASHAN ZATECKY
Petitioner:
ROBERT L. MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MURRAY v. ZATECKY
as 1:2016cv00780
Petitioner:
ROBERT L. MURRAY
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
