Cases 1 - 6 of 6
MARTINO et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2021cv01808
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARTINO, SYBIL MARTINO, DOROTHY ACKLIN and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC v. Lax World, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv03017
Plaintiff:
Cascade Maverik Lacrosse, LLC
Defendant:
Lax World, LLC , Frank Barbarino , Michael P. Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peer 1 Network (USA), Inc. v. A Aventura Chiropractic Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv23772
Plaintiff:
Peer 1 Network (USA), Inc.
Defendant:
A Aventura Chiropractic Center, Inc. and Robert Martino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
United States of America v. Martino et al
as 5:2010cv00637
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert Martino
Garnishee:
Bill Rapp Nissan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Steve Trunk, et al v. City of San Diego, et al
as 08-56436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE TRUNK and PHILIP K. PAULSON
Plaintiff:
MINA SAGHEB, JUDITH M. COPELAND, JEWISH WAR VETERANS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MOUNT SOLEDAD MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION, Real parties in interest and others
Amicus Curiae:
PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE, AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, HADASSAH, THE WOMEN'S ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Jewish War Veterans of the Uni, et al v. City of San Diego, et al
as 08-56415
Plaintiff:
STEVE TRUNK
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEWISH WAR VETERANS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC., RICHARD A. SMITH, MINA SAGHEB and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary of Defense
Amicus Curiae:
PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE, AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, HADASSAH, THE WOMEN'S ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
