Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Robert Patterson v. John B. Mann et al
as 8:2023mc00022
Plaintiff:
Robert Patterson
Defendant:
John B. Mann
Patterson v. Patterson et al
as 9:2020cv00092
Defendant:
Rodolfo Robert Patterson, Robert Parker, Kris Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Jerad Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Bissada (Reynolds)
as 17-2856
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Joseph Bissada, AKA Quaddafi, Christopher Labate, AKA Chris AM, Robert Patterson and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Thomas Reynolds
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Patterson v. Selene Finance, LP
as 5:2016cv00730
Plaintiff:
Robert Patterson
Defendant:
Selene Finance, LP
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Christopher Stoller v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 16-7140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Stoller
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN Financial Corporation, William C. Erbey, Ronald Faris and others
Stoller et al v. Ocwen Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv09527
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stoller and Michael Stoller
Defendant:
Ocwen Financial Corporation, William C. Erbey, Ronald Faris and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
TD Bank, N.A. v. HR Global Investment, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv21285
Plaintiff:
TD Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
HR Global Investment, Inc., Union Savings Bank, Cooperative Practices Del Canal/1/Corp. Serv. Multiples Coopra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. The Roy Benavidez-Robert Patterson All Airborne Chapter, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv00060
Defendant:
Jose H. Hernandez, Christopher G. Lewis, The Roy Benavidez-Robert Patterson All Airborne Chapter, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
