Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Taylor v. I.C. System, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00023
Plaintiff: Robert Taylor
Defendant: I.C. System, Inc. and Sprint Corporation
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Taylor v. Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00022
Plaintiff: Robert Taylor
Defendant: Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc. and Sprint Corporation
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Taylor v. Wells et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00848
Plaintiff: Robert Taylor
Defendant: Daniel Wells and Lee Hill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor et al v. Long
as 3:2017cv01126
Plaintiff: Robert Taylor and Dana Taylor
Defendant: William B. Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Contract Insurance
Taylor v. Graddick We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00253
Plaintiff: Robert Taylor
Defendant: Charles A. Graddick, Daniel Wells and Lee Hall, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swan et al v. Taylor et al
as 8:2017cv00994
Plaintiff: Walter Swan and Jane Swan
Defendant: John Robert Taylor and The Hertz Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Jonathan Taylor We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-10638
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JONATHAN ROBERT TAYLOR
Taylor v. Medical Staff We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00081
Plaintiff: Robert Taylor
Defendant: Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. YOUNG
as 4:2013cv00458
Plaintiff: ROBERT TAYLOR
Defendant: MORRIS YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01174
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?