Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Collins v. Martin et al
as 3:2019cv00074
Defendant:
Kelly Lantham, Michael Martin, Sherry Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Martin et al
as 3:2019cv00055
Defendant:
Kelly Lantham, Michael Martin, Sherry Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2018cv00193
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Michael Martin, Ms. Sherry Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv09053
Plaintiff:
Robin Miller and Tim Miller
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv07203
Plaintiff:
Robin Miller
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Lamar v. Jackson et al
as 3:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
Lashan D. Lamar
Defendant:
Marvin C. Plumley, Robin Miller, Doug White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2014cv00017
Plaintiff:
Aaron F. Edwards
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Marvin C. Plumley, Robin Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv03490
Plaintiff:
Robin Miller
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Giffen v. West Virginia Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv00391
Plaintiff:
Bradley J. Giffen
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections , West Virginia Parole Board , Huttonsville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
