Cases 31 - 40 of 466
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tapler v. Robinson et al
as 5:2023ct03146
Plaintiff:
Michael Tapler
Defendant:
Sharod Robinson and Joseph Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
ABJUL BEY and JAGUAR SUN OF BA-PAKAL LUMA NATION
Defendant:
JUDGE BRADLEY R. ALLEN, SR., GRAHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAW RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
GAUSE v. GEOFF et al
as 1:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
WALTER T. GAUSE
Defendant:
GREGORY GEOFF, FNU - SHAW, MORRISON LEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockamy v. Robinson et al
as 5:2023ct03145
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lockamy
Defendant:
Sharod Robinson and Joseph Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ROBINSON v. USA
as 1:2023cv00446
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LAMONT ROBINSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Robinson, III v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02077
Petitioner:
Jim Robinson, III
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bungardner-Lockamy et al v. Robinson et al
as 5:2023ct03132
Plaintiff:
Zachary Bumgardner-Lockamy, Antonio Lockamy and Michael Tapler
Defendant:
Sharod Robinson and Joseph Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
