Cases 51 - 60 of 486
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stitts v. O'Connor
as 3:2022cv00906
Plaintiff:
Turama Stitts
Defendant:
Robinson O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Speedway LLC
as 2:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Deborah Robinson
Defendant:
Speedway LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
MICKLES v. ADAMS REAL ESTATE et al
as 2:2022cv00400
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant:
ADAMS REAL ESTATE, GOLDEN OAKS REAL ESTATE, BRETT ROBINSON REAL ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
Christal Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ROBINSON v. REGALE et al
as 1:2022cv01675
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROBINSON
Defendant:
D. REGALE, A. SMITH, FAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00633
Petitioner:
Kevin Robinson
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BOZELL v. STILLAHOWER et al
as 1:2022cv01512
Plaintiff:
DAVID BOZELL
Defendant:
TYLER STILLAHOWER, SAMUEL ROBINSON, SHAYLA HEAGY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
