Cases 1 - 10 of 223
Robinson v. Human Services Campus Incorporated
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
Human Services Campus Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Robinson v. Robinson et al
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Robert W Robinson
Defendant:
Carol A Robinson and Tami P Sexton
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 3005 Detention of Mail for Temporary Periods
Robinson v. White et al
as 2:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Ryan Robinson
Defendant:
Clifton Earl White, Unknown White, Spider Transport Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Robinson v. Human Services Campus Incorporated
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
Human Services Campus Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv02489
Plaintiff:
Ranesia Lashawn Robinson
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Robinson v. BMO Harris Bank NA
as 2:2023cv02334
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
BMO Harris Bank NA and BMO Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv02310
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Robinson
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolford v. Kendall et al
as 2:2023cv02168
Plaintiff:
Allen Kirk Wolford
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, III and Brian Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01656
Plaintiff:
Shawndale Luis Robinson
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Clint Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
