Cases 1 - 10 of 335
RODGERS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00539
Petitioner:
ROBERT RODGERS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ocampo v. Illinois State Police et al
as 1:2024cv01926
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ocampo
Defendant:
Illinois State Police and Adam W Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rodgers v. McDonough et al
as 3:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Timothy P. Rodgers
Defendant:
Dennis McDonough, Department of Veterans Affairs, Joshua Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Rodgers v. Btisza et al
as 1:2024cv01639
Plaintiff:
Dante Rodgers
Defendant:
Btisza, Kacey and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00488
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rodgers
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eagle v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00438
Plaintiff:
Rodger Eagle
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodgers v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv01281
Plaintiff:
Dante Rodgers
Defendant:
R Ramirez, X Saldana, R Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rodgers v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Rodgers
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC and Camping World RV Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
