Cases 1 - 10 of 13
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22951
Plaintiff:
ROGER JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv40676
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ROGER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv15323
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK ROGER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv90202
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC, f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceuticals Research and Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv06434
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2018cv10454
Plaintiff:
Peggy Jones and Roger Jones
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roger Jones v. USA, et al
as 13-2336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Scharer v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona et al
as 2:2013cv10404
Plaintiff:
Douglas P Scharer
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona and Roger Jones
JONES vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2012cv00290
Plaintiff:
ROGER JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv06592
Plaintiff:
Roger Jones
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
