Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Robert Cotner v. James Stang, et al
as 12-55056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT COTNER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES I. STANG, in his individual capacity, OMNI MANAGEMENT TRUSTEES and RON ANDERSON
Robert Cotner v. James I Stang et al
as 2:2011cv10166
Defendant:
Ron Anderson, Omni Management Trustees and James I Stang
Plaintiff:
Robert Cotner
Clayton v. Henry et al
as 5:2011cv00279
Plaintiff:
James E Clayton
Defendant:
Brad Henry, Mary Fallin, Justin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hill, et al
as 10-7097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILTON VERAN WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELA HILL, DCF Inmate Trust Fund Supervisor, RON ANDERSON, DOC Assistant General Counsel, DEBBIE MORTON, DOC Director's Designee and others
Cotner v. Jones, et al
as 10-7037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT E. COTNER
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, SUSAN MINGUS and RON ANDERSON
Thomas v. Frech, et al
as 10-6058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
KATRYNA FRECH, Health Services Administrator, DAVID PARKER, Warden, JEFF TROUTT, Doctor, JCCC and others
Defendant:
ROY ARIAN, Physician's Assistant, ROBIN LNU, Nurse, JCCC, JANET DOWLING, Deputy Warden and others
Cotner v. Jones et al
as 6:2010cv00079
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Cotner
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Susan Mingus and Ron Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Anderson et al
as 6:2010cv00075
Plaintiff:
Ricky O. Williams
Defendant:
Ron Anderson, Jim Rabon, Bobby Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mata v. Anderson
as 10-2031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN MATA
Defendant - Appellee:
RON ANDERSON, Sgt.
Cotner v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 10-6004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT E. COTNER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, RON ANDERSON, Attorney, JUSTIN JONES, Director, ODOC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
