Cases 21 - 30 of 30
USA v. Ronald Smith
as 09-30357
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD E. SMITH
Ronald J Smith v. Richard Alvarado
as 5:2009cv01340
Petitioner:
Ronald J Smith
Respondent:
Richard Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Smith v. MCSO Towers Kitchen
as 2:2009cv00100
Plaintiff:
Ronald Edward Smith
Defendant:
MCSO Towers Kitchen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Douglas John Alexander MacKenzie v. John Ashcroft et al
as 8:2008cv00816
Petitioner:
Douglas John Alexander MacKenzie
Respondent:
John Ashcroft, Officer in Charge and Ronald J Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. USA
as 1:2008cv00122
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Smith
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
USA v. Ronald Smith
as 08-30337
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD L. SMITH
Houssein Ahmad Hamami v. John Ashcroft et al
as 2:2007cv06836
Petitioner:
Houssein Ahmad Hamami
Respondent:
John Ashcroft, Ronald J Smith and Anita Maker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
George C Williams v. John Ashcroft et al
as 2:2007cv05953
Petitioner:
George C Williams
Respondent:
John Ashcroft, Ronald J Smith and Anita Maker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Almodova et al v. City and County of Honolulu
as 1:2007cv00378
Plaintiff:
Jonathan S. Almodova, Jonathan S. Almodova, Randall Arakaki and others
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. Mahoney
as 94-99003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD A. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MAHONEY, Montana State Prison
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK DAY, Acting Administrator of Corrections Division
Amicus Curiae:
CANADIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION and WILLIAM SCHABAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
