Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Ronald Edward Williams v. USA, et al
as 22-1834
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
WILLIAMS EL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv00457
Petitioner:
RONALD-EDWARDS WILLIAMS EL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ronald Williams v. Brian Lammer
as 20-3153
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN LAMMER, Warden
WILLIAMS EL v. STATE OF NEW YORK et al
as 1:2020cv02571
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD-EDWARDS WILLIAMS EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. BELL
as 2:2018cv00409
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Respondent:
J. R. BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. BELL et al
as 2:2018cv00240
Respondent:
J. R. BELL and TERRE HAUTE FEDERAL CORRECTION INSTITUTION
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WILLIAMS v. BELL
as 2:2018cv00196
Respondent:
J.R. BELL
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. Colvin
as 2:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ronald Edward Williams
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILLIAMS v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016mc01154
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
WILLIAMS v. SIEREVELD et al
as 2:2016cv00032
Defendant:
V. RIGSBY, KATHERINE SIEREVELD, CLINT SWIFT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
