Cases 1 - 10 of 39
United States of America v. Jordan (USA)
as 26-918
Defendant:
KARL JORDAN, JR., RONALD WASHINGTON, JAY BRYANT and others
Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Washington v. Progressive Advanced Insurance Company
as 4:2026cv00251
Plaintiff:
Ronald Washington
Defendant:
Progressive Advanced Insurance Company doing business as Progressive Direct Auto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
WASHINGTON v. MARION COUNTY AND ITS EMPLOYEES et al
as 1:2026cv00060
Plaintiff:
RONALD WASHINGTON
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY AND ITS EMPLOYEES, DOCTOR #1 MS. A., DOCTOR #2 and others
Interested Party:
WELLPATH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Jordan (USA)
as 26-41
Defendant:
KARL JORDAN, JR., RONALD WASHINGTON, JAY BRYANT and others
Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Jordan (USA)
as 26-16
Defendant:
KARL JORDAN, JR., RONALD WASHINGTON, JAY BRYANT and others
Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Diaz et al v. Brands LBNY corporation d/b/a Brands Deli
as 1:2025cv02316
Plaintiff:
Desiree Diaz, Erin Anderson-Wrapp, Brian Donovan and others
Defendant:
Brands LBNY corporation d/b/a Brands Deli
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Diaz et al v. Brands LBNY Corporation
as 2:2025cv02316
Plaintiff:
Desiree Diaz, Erin Anderson-Wrapp, Brian Donovan and others
Defendant:
Brands LBNY Corporation doing business as Brands Deli
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WASHINGTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13344
Plaintiff:
RONALD WASHINGTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Washington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Ronald Washington and Ronald T. Washington
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
