Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hernandez-Yanes, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4006
Petitioner:
FRANCIS DANIEL HERNANDEZ-YANES, ROSA RIVAS-RETANA and DANIEL ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-RIVAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rivas-Flores v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 1:2021cv00753
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Plaintiff:
Rosa Rivas-Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04631
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rosa Hernandez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-4100
Petitioner:
ROSA RIVAS HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Rivas v. Preston et al
as 5:2011cv00193
Defendant:
Albert G Preston and Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rosa Rivas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Richard Alcala et al v. Four Seasons Hotels Limited, et al
as 2:2009cv00785
Plaintiff:
Richard Alcala, Richard Alcala, Jesus Martinez and others
Defendant:
Four Seasons Hotels Limited, Four Seasons Hotels Limited and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
VENTURA et al v. BEBO FOODS, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00621
Plaintiff:
JESUS VENTURA, ROSA RIVAS and MOHAMMED DOUH
Defendant:
BEBO FOODS, INC., GALILEO RESTAURANT, RD TRATTORIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United Tenants of Mercedes Palms et al v. U.S. Department of Housing
as 7:2007cv00310
Plaintiff:
United Tenants of Mercedes Palms, Osvaldo Loera, Velma Cano and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Secretary - United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and American Secured Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
