Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Garcia v. Kallis
as 3:2017cv00112
Petitioner:
Rosalie Garcia
Respondent:
Steven Kallis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garcia v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00108
Petitioner:
Rosalie Garcia
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garcia v. United States of America
as 16-3047
Petitioner:
Rosalie Garcia
Respondent:
United States of America
Skurkis et al v. Montelongo et al
as 3:2016cv00972
Defendant:
Armando Montelongo , Armando Montelongo Seminars, LLC , Performance Advantage Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Skurkis , Trinadh Bylipudi , John Acker and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Garcia v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv19092
Plaintiff:
Rosalie Garcia
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Mendoza (Guzman)
as 14-525
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose Francisco Mendoza, AKA Jose Vidales-Mendoza, AKA Juan Carlos Flores, AKA Pepe, Francisco Ambriz, Jr., AKA Pee Wee, Alba Nazario, AKA La Flaca, AKA Geovany and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Emerson Guzman
Rudy Aguilera, et al v. Prospect Mortgage LLC, et al
as 13-56603
Petitioner - Appellee:
RUDY AGUILERA, RONALD ALPAUGH, FIRAS BILLEH and others
Respondent - Appellant:
PROSPECT MORTGAGE, LLC
Rudy Aguilera et al v. Prospect Mortgage LLC
as CAC/2:13-cv-05070
Petitioner:
Rudy Aguilera , Ronald Alpaugh , Firas Billeh and others
Respondent:
Prospect Mortgage LLC
Rudy Aguilera et al v. Prospect Mortgage LLC
as 2:2013cv05070
Petitioner:
Rudy Aguilera, Ronald Alpaugh, Firas Billeh and others
Respondent:
Prospect Mortgage LLC
United States of America v. Garcia, et al (Roman)
as 12-3471
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rosalie Garcia, AKA Shorty, Luis Morges and Ricardo Silva, AKA Psycho
Defendant - Appellant:
Manuel Roman, AKA Manny
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
