Cases 1 - 5 of 5
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. EXTRAORDINARY CATERING, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., BEECHWOOD MUSIC CORPORATION, RICK SPRINGFIELD MUSIC and others
Defendant:
EXTRAORDINARY CATERING, LLC doing business as REDD'S ON UNION, JOSEF ALEXANDER, YASMINE ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BMG Rights Management (US) LLC v. Cox Communications, Inc.
as 17-1352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BMG RIGHTS MANAGEMENT (US) LLC
Plaintiff:
ROUND HILL MUSIC LP
Defendant - Appellee:
COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED and COXCOM, LLC
Defendant:
COX ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, COXCOM, INC., d/b/a Cox Communications of Northern Virginia and JOHN DOE, IP Subscriber 174.65.175.31
Party-in-Interest:
RIGHTSCORP, INC.
BMG Rights Management (US) LLC v. Cox Communications, Incorporat
as 17-1353
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BMG RIGHTS MANAGEMENT (US) LLC
Plaintiff:
ROUND HILL MUSIC LP
Defendant - Appellant:
COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED and COXCOM, LLC
Defendant:
COX ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, COXCOM, INC., d/b/a Cox Communications of Northern Virginia and JOHN DOE, IP Subscriber 174.65.175.31
Party-in-Interest:
RIGHTSCORP, INC.
BMG Rights Management (US) LLC v. Cox Communications, Inc.
as 16-1972
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BMG RIGHTS MANAGEMENT (US) LLC
Plaintiff:
ROUND HILL MUSIC LP
Defendant - Appellant:
COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED and COXCOM, LLC
Defendant:
COX ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, COXCOM, INC., d/b/a Cox Communications of Northern Virginia and JOHN DOE, IP Subscriber 174.65.175.31
Party-in-Interest:
RIGHTSCORP, INC.
BMG Rights Management (US)LLC et al v. Cox Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01611
Plaintiff:
BMG Rights Management (US)LLC and Round Hill Music LP
Defendant:
Cox Enterprises, Inc. , Cox Communications, Inc. , CoxCom, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
