Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Flora v. United States Of America
as 5:2023cv01525
Plaintiff:
Rowell Flora
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harris v. Pearl River County, Miss et al
as 1:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Timothy Franklin Harris
Defendant:
Pearl River County, Miss and Lenoir Rowell Criminal Justice Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flora v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00789
Plaintiff:
Rowell Flora
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Quinonez-Quinonez
as 22-51079
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rowell Flora and Esteban Valentin Quinonez-Quinonez
USA v. Flora
as 22-51057
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rowell Flora, also known as Caranto Rowell
Rowell v. Dover Bay Specialty Insurance Co et al
as 1:2022cv04168
Plaintiff:
Betty Rowell
Defendant:
Dover Bay Specialty Insurance Co, State Farm Fire & Casualty Co and State Farm General Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FILING ERROR
as 1:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Wendy Davis, Marva Sadler, Sean Mehl and others
Defendant:
Mistie Sharp, Sadie Weldon, Ashley Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. Sharp et al
as 1:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Wendy Davis, Marva Sadler, Sean Mehl and others
Defendant:
Mistie Sharp, Sadie Weldon, Ashley Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-30139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Flora v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv01272
Plaintiff:
Rowell Flora
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
